Top Frame
Home
Match Schedule & Results
Latest News
Fact
Picture Galleries
Articles
Interviews
Video
Audio
Links
Bottom Frame




GO ROGER! - The Roger Federer Fansite
Articles

Published: September 7, 2005

Who's No. 1? It's Federer, in Many Ways

By Selena Roberts, New York Times

THE meaning of a number depends on who is No. 1.

As an ex-No. 1, Lleyton Hewitt pulled off a rarity for him as he scurried around Arthur Ashe Stadium yesterday without offending a linesman with a slur, infuriating his opponent with an obscene gesture or irritating the crowd with his excessive "C'mons."

He didn't have enough time. It took only 94 minutes for Hewitt to dispense of Dominik Hrbaty in the fourth round of the United States Open. So Hewitt had to save his typically tasteless remarks for later, when he poked at the holes designed and cut into the shoulder blades of Hrbaty's fashionista shirt.

"I wouldn't wear it, but it made it a lot easier for me to beat him," Hewitt said, adding, "I just couldn't lose to a bloke wearing a shirt like that."

Hewitt is unvarnished, irascible and impolitic. In other words, he hasn't changed a bit since he was the No. 1 player in 2001 and 2002, back when he created a trail of charged feuds with players and legal disputes with the ATP.

He is as self-absorbed as always. In a year when he referred to an umpire with a gay slur, in a season when he nearly fought with a Davis Cup opponent, Hewitt also revealed the depths of his inner control freak. According to Australian reports, Hewitt sold the media rights to his spring engagement, summer wedding and wife's pregnancy. So far, no autographed pictures of sonograms have surfaced on eBay.

The current No. 1, Roger Federer, followed Hewitt onto the stadium court, able to reach into his bag of liquid strokes to frustrate Nicolas Kiefer, winning in four sets while maintaining his trademark calm. Later, always the gentleman, he complimented Kiefer.

Federer took his No. 1 ranking as a responsibility, not a perch of entitlement, maturing into a player of thought, action and social awareness. Would he ever dabble in politics?

"Like Ahnold?" he said in a Schwarzenegger-esque accent during a recent lunch. "I don't think so. I'm more into, in general, helping people. Like Muhammad Ali does for the world.

"Think about the world not only like 'God Bless America' sort of thing but God bless the world, because we're all together. We're living on the same world, you know? And not alone. Sometimes people forget. This is why we have fights all over the world. Of course you can't stop them, but still pick an issue, maybe in the future. Of course it goes into politics a little bit. Maybe. Who knows what I'll do? But I don't really see this sort of role. I'd like to be more of an ambassador."

The difference in depth between Hewitt and Federer, and the divergence in their approach to No. 1, is certainly two parts personality, but at least one part entourage. Hewitt is surrounded by a bevy of yes men and sycophantic handlers, while Federer has chosen a liberating, agent-less existence, grounded by a girlfriend/manager who will tell the emperor off.

Perspective is a choice. And the choice of some top players was revealed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. One after another, past and present No. 1 players - athletes of high visibility and influential voice - have displayed how sheltered they are by their guffawing circle of advisers.

If advised correctly, Serena Williams would not have celebrated herself as a philanthropist by offering $100 per ace to hurricane relief when her dog, Jackie, travels in a designer handbag that costs many times that much.

If anyone in her management group had prepped her, Venus Williams would not have used an unfortunate line like, "I really don't watch the news," when asked about the devastation in New Orleans.

If she could separate herself from her packaging, Maria Sharapova might have something to add on an issue outside of her perfume launch.

True, athlete activism has been rendered a quaint notion when so many sports icons continue to adopt the lucrative Michael Jordan theory on social causes. As told in Sam Smith's 1995 book, "Second Coming," Jordan was asked why he wouldn't support a black Democratic candidate to unseat Jesse Helms in North Carolina. "Republicans buy shoes, too," Jordan said.

Social conscience may have nearly flatlined in sports, but perspective doesn't have to be buried with it. It is no coincidence that the most introspective responses to Hurricane Katrina came from Andre Agassi, an ex-No. 1, and Lindsay Davenport, the current No. 1.

Agassi is handled by one man, Perry Rogers, a childhood friend who isn't afraid to tell his client the truth. The player's box for Davenport is usually filled by a coach, maybe her husband and, at times, her mother.

Agassi and Davenport do not shut themselves off with a fortress of cling-ons. Agassi and Davenport do not seek the advice of shameless sycophants.

Perspective is a choice of all those who ascend to No. 1. The perch can be treated as a responsibility - as Federer sees it - or as a pulpit of entitlement, as Hewitt once responded to it.

Perspective is not American, European or Australian. The meaning behind the world's No. 1 is universally lost or gained in the number of yes men.



Right Frame