Top Frame
Home
Match Schedule & Results
Latest News
Fact
Picture Galleries
Articles
Interviews
Video
Audio
Links
Bottom Frame




GO ROGER! - The Roger Federer Fansite
Interviews

Saturday, August 9, 2003

Montreal TMS Semifinal

By Tennis Masters Canada Official Site

An interview with: ROGER FEDERER

R. FEDERER/A. Roddick 4-6, 6-3, 6-7 (3-7)

Tour Official: Okay. Questions, please.

Reporter: Roger, is it more disappointing to lose the match, or lose the chance to be number one?

Roger Federer: Well, you know, I don't know the calculations, so I don't know. Obviously, you know, if you tell me that I seriously lost number one spot, of course, yeah, it's a pity. I've never been number one, but I've never been number two, either, and I'm number two now, so let's take the positive part of the story. It's never nice to lose a match. So the last time I won, this time it's his turn.

Reporter: Did you feel it was bad about your play today or did you feel that Andy played that much better?

Roger Federer: We had a 7-6 in the third in the past so, you know, it's difficult to say, because his serve is so big and, you know, it's tough to say if you played well or not. It's not really in your hands. It's about his service game. It's got a lot to do with his game. I thought, you know, he played one of the better matches against me, but I feel like maybe this may have been the worst match of all that I played against him. Because every time I played him I always felt very good from the baseline. I thought I was really reading his serve well and today was maybe just not the case. I still was up a break in the third.

Reporter: Roger, you were up a break, you were up 3-1, and then he hits that shot between his leg and the crowd gets into it and stuff. Do you think that was him trying to get some emotion going for himself to get back in it?

Roger Federer: No, you know, why not do something like that if you're already losing? And, you know, if he makes that shot which it wasn't so difficult for insiders, anyway. I'm in a non-winning position; if I hit the winner it's a great point, if I lose he's the hero. Why not try something else? But I don't think that changed the round. The crowd was already into the match enough. That was just a point.

Reporter: He comes in more against you than he did before, doesn't he?

Roger Federer: No, I don't think so. I was passing him all the time at Wimbledon.

Reporter: You don't think he tends to come to the net more than he used to?

Roger Federer: Well, when I play, he can come in. I'm chipping all the time, so it's easy to come in on. But I rather go for safety returns and try to make him hit a ball underneath the net. It's very often a temptation to come in after. So I think he's coming in against me more often because he knows, if he doesn't, I'll come, so.

Reporter: Roger, was it a surprise to you how hard he came out hitting? Right from the forehand he seemed to be going everything for broke.

Roger Federer: We all know he has a big forehand; it was no surprise. I was more surprised by Robredo's forehand the other day, than his forehand. You always have to expect the worst. So that was a bad start from my side. You know, I didn't play a good game there when he broke me, and right away the set was gone and I was really unlucky there a few times, tight calls.

Reporter: How uncharacteristic was your play in the tie break?

Roger Federer: Uncharacteristic?

Reporter: Uncharacteristic how you normally play, you had a double fault, hit a couple of balls long?

Roger Federer: What do you want me to tell you? You know, I took some chances and early on it didn't work, so right away I was down 4-0. It's not the best start, is it, but nothing you can do about it later, you know. Usually I'm a good tie break player; today was his day. So I try to many back but it was just not good enough.

Reporter: Excuse me, Roger, you missed the chance to be number one today, but how do you feel about your chances in the next few weeks of getting that spot and how important is it to you?

Roger Federer: Well, first I'm going to relax from this week. These Masters Series are tough, almost too tough from my point of view, you know. Because if you want to win both weeks, you've got to play 12 out of 14 days, or 12 out of 13 if you start like me on the Tuesday, which I think is insane, you know. So -- but I'll go to since I and try my best there, again. Hopefully, I'll get through the first round, you know, at least so I just get into a tournament there and then I'll have a week off before the U.S. Open and I'll be perfectly ready for the Open, because I've played well here and looking forward for the rest of the hard court season.

Reporter: Roger, are you saying that having the back-to-back Tennis Masters events, Montreal and -- or Canada and Cincinnati, is a scheduling that doesn't make any sense?

Roger Federer: Same as Rome, Hamburg. Yeah, I think it's too much. You see too many guys pulling out. That's what the people -- tournaments don't want. So, you know, it's just -- but we've argued about scheduling enough in the past, so.

Reporter: Not suggesting you were in any way at all unprofessional, but did you have a good evening out the night before?

Roger Federer: Yeah, it was a good night, relaxing dinner. And obviously stay professional. Didn't lose my mind, you know.
[LAUGHTER]

Reporter: Who paid the bill?



Right Frame