|
August 26, 2004
Federer wants USA to know him better
By Tom Clark, USA Today
Roger Federer is a good juggler. You probably didn't know that. He's a very good tennis player. But you knew that.
The 23-year-old Swiss enters the U.S. Open on
Monday as the No. 1 seed with a 58-6 match record in 2004. He's
captured a career-high eight titles on the ATP Tour circuit this year
(including the Australian Open and Wimbledon).
But besides his flawless tennis game, Federer
remains a bit of mystery in the USA. Fans know he bucks conformity by
playing and traveling without a coach or entourage, and they know he
was awarded a cow by his country after winning Wimbledon last year.
That's about it. Now, as he continues his assault on the tennis record
book, he is hoping we get to know him better as a person.
Federer, whose mother is from South Africa,
speaks Swiss-German, English and French fluently. He spoke with USA
TODAY this week from New York:
Q. You looked like you were having a lot of fun carrying Switzerland's flag at the Olympics opening ceremonies.
A. It was an unbelievable experience. I didn't
play so well (losing in second round), but I have that memory of
carrying the flag to look back on.
Q. What other Olympic sport do you wish you were good at?
A. Athletics or gymnastics — the classic Olympic sports.
Q. Explain the difference in playing the U.S. Open compared with Wimbledon, besides the playing surface?
A. It is a totally different setup. At Wimbledon
it's a little more quiet. I stay in a house with my girlfriend, and we
cook ourselves. Now we are in Manhattan, where the traffic is quite
different, so you have to plan your days differently. It's a nice
change for me. I try to think positive, and I love coming back to New
York. It's an incredible city — there's lots to do over the next three
weeks.
Q. Do you get a chance to explore the cities you visit on the tennis tour?
A. More and more I try to see more than the
hotel and the club, because once I stop traveling I might be
disappointed that I was at a place and didn't see enough of it.
Q. The media have been hyping your potential
rivalry with (defending U.S. Open champion) Andy Roddick. Do you see
the value in having a rivalry in tennis, so you'll let him win a few
times?
A. I'm not going to let him win. He's not far
away from beating me anyway (Federer is 7-1 lifetime vs. Roddick,
including a win at the Wimbledon final this year). He does probably
need to win a couple to get the rivalry really going. But I hope that
doesn't come too soon. Rivalries are good for sports — and with me from
Europe and him from the States, it would be good to push tennis.
Q. Who is the best player you've ever faced?
A. (Pete) Sampras. Even though I beat him that
day (at Wimbledon in 2001). For all he's achieved, it was great to face
him. After him it's (Andre) Agassi.
Q. If you could steal one thing from anybody's game on tour now, what would it be?
A. The volleys of (Tim) Henman. I'm not bad at the net, but would love to be better.
Q. Next week at the U.S. Open you are going to try to win three of the four Grand Slams. Did you ever think that was possible?
A. Looking back, yes, but in the beginning you
never think it's going to be an easy thing to do. After I won the
Australian Open this year, people were talking about me winning the
Grand Slam, and I thought that was impossible. If I can play better in
the U.S. Open than in the past (Federer has lost in the fourth round
the last three years), we'll have to see if it's good enough. I've
never really been in a huge center-court match there. I need it for the
experience.
Q. Do you still think it's impossible to win all four majors in one year?
A. Everything is possible. But the men's game is
wide open. There are so many good players on all surfaces. To be up for
every match is very difficult. I lost to a better man at the French
(Gustavo Kuerten). I deserved to lose because Guga was better that day.
Q. What's the most extravagant thing you've
bought? (Since turning pro at age 17 in 1998, Federer has won
$11,491,230 on the ATP Tour.)
A. I make sure the people around me get treated
well, first. I do get myself a nice gift on occasion, because I work
hard. I got myself some cars, an apartment, a house. My favorite cars
are Aston Martin.
Q. If you weren't playing tennis, what would you be doing?
A. I'd think I'd be a soccer player. I played
until I was 12 and have followed it ever since. I never had dreams of
being a pilot or anything — I've always been interested in sports.
Q. What's the biggest misconception about you?
A. In America, people don't know me well enough
yet to have any misconceptions. They know the tennis player, but not
the person. I am seldom in America, so when I'm here I'll try to do
more interviews than in the past. I hope they see me as relaxed, cool.
We'll have to see.
Q. What are your favorite places to visit?
A. Australia — I like the down-to-earth people,
their friendliness. Rome is a great city. Miami for the culture and the
beach. I love Asia more and more. After the U.S. Open, I'm going to
visit L.A. for the first time.
Q. Are there any other players you like to watch?
A. I used to enjoy watching (fellow Swiss)
Martina Hingis. With her gone, now my interest in women's tennis is not
as high. On the men's side I used to like watching Marcelo Rios' game
when he played.
Q. What do you expect to do with the rest of your life after tennis?
A. I created a charity last Christmas (The Roger
Federer Foundation, helping disadvantaged youths) which is something
that goes beyond my tennis game. After that, no real plans yet.
Q. What do you think of racket technology in tennis? Is it too developed?
A. I think it's OK. If you look at the top
players, there is only one guy with incredible power, and that is
Roddick. There is a misconception of the game being all power because
of Andy. I play different, with feel and tactical decisions. If you
look at the Spaniards, they play with spin. The players will always
adapt.
Q. What are your goals for the U.S. Open?
A. I have high hopes. The dream is to win three
of the four Grand Slams this year. But I really have to start from zero
and play well from the first round on. I've lost some recently, and
players might think I could be down. But I feel good.
| Dominance index |
How dominant has Roger Federer been in 2004?
In numbers
.875: In his last 25 tournaments going back to June 2003, he's 98-14 (.875) in matches, winning 12 titles.
1:
Has been ranked No. 1 every week since Feb. 2 after winning his first
Australian Open title.
2:
He is the first player to win two Grand Slam titles in a season
entering the U.S. Open since Pete Sampras in 1997.
3:
He is trying to win three Grand Slam titles in a season for the first
time since Mats Wilander won three in 1988.
5:
One of five players (Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors, Stefan Edberg, Gustavo
Kuerten) in the Open Era to win his first three Grand Slam finals. No
player has won his first four finals.
8:
He is the first player to win at least eight titles going into the U.S.
Open since Thomas Muster won 10 in 1995.
14-0:
He is undefeated (14-0) against top-10 opponents going back to the
season-ending 2003 Tennis Masters Cup in Houston.
15-2: In the last two years he has a 15-2 mark in tournament finals, including 12 of 13. 23:
Compiled a 23-match winning streak this year, the best since Sampras
won 24 in a row in 1999. 1979:
Won titles on grass (Halle, Wimbledon), clay (Gstaad) and hardcourt
(Toronto), the first player to win consecutive titles on those surfaces
since Borg in 1979.
In words
"He
doesn't seem to have a weakness. ... He does have a chance to be one of
the greatest players to ever live, no doubt." - John McEnroe "He does everything great. He knows the game well. As good as it gets out there, really." - Andre Agassi "Roger's the greatest, most complete player I have ever seen." - Patrick Rafter "He's
a player that really could dominate the game a little bit, the same way
Pete Sampras did for a while." - Stefan Edberg "Roger
Federer is most probably a better player than Pete Sampras was. I think
Federer can win all four (Grand Slams)." - Mats Wilander |
|