Top Frame
Home
Match Schedule & Results
Latest News
Fact
Picture Galleries
Articles
Interviews
Video
Audio
Links
Bottom Frame




GO ROGER! - The Roger Federer Fansite
Interviews

August 26, 2004

Federer wants USA to know him better

By Tom Clark, USA Today

Roger Federer is a good juggler. You probably didn't know that. He's a very good tennis player. But you knew that.

The 23-year-old Swiss enters the U.S. Open on Monday as the No. 1 seed with a 58-6 match record in 2004. He's captured a career-high eight titles on the ATP Tour circuit this year (including the Australian Open and Wimbledon).

But besides his flawless tennis game, Federer remains a bit of mystery in the USA. Fans know he bucks conformity by playing and traveling without a coach or entourage, and they know he was awarded a cow by his country after winning Wimbledon last year. That's about it. Now, as he continues his assault on the tennis record book, he is hoping we get to know him better as a person.

Federer, whose mother is from South Africa, speaks Swiss-German, English and French fluently. He spoke with USA TODAY this week from New York:

Q. You looked like you were having a lot of fun carrying Switzerland's flag at the Olympics opening ceremonies.

A. It was an unbelievable experience. I didn't play so well (losing in second round), but I have that memory of carrying the flag to look back on.

Q. What other Olympic sport do you wish you were good at?

A. Athletics or gymnastics — the classic Olympic sports.

Q. Explain the difference in playing the U.S. Open compared with Wimbledon, besides the playing surface?

A. It is a totally different setup. At Wimbledon it's a little more quiet. I stay in a house with my girlfriend, and we cook ourselves. Now we are in Manhattan, where the traffic is quite different, so you have to plan your days differently. It's a nice change for me. I try to think positive, and I love coming back to New York. It's an incredible city — there's lots to do over the next three weeks.

Q. Do you get a chance to explore the cities you visit on the tennis tour?

A. More and more I try to see more than the hotel and the club, because once I stop traveling I might be disappointed that I was at a place and didn't see enough of it.

Q. The media have been hyping your potential rivalry with (defending U.S. Open champion) Andy Roddick. Do you see the value in having a rivalry in tennis, so you'll let him win a few times?

A. I'm not going to let him win. He's not far away from beating me anyway (Federer is 7-1 lifetime vs. Roddick, including a win at the Wimbledon final this year). He does probably need to win a couple to get the rivalry really going. But I hope that doesn't come too soon. Rivalries are good for sports — and with me from Europe and him from the States, it would be good to push tennis.

Q. Who is the best player you've ever faced?

A. (Pete) Sampras. Even though I beat him that day (at Wimbledon in 2001). For all he's achieved, it was great to face him. After him it's (Andre) Agassi.

Q. If you could steal one thing from anybody's game on tour now, what would it be?

A. The volleys of (Tim) Henman. I'm not bad at the net, but would love to be better.

Q. Next week at the U.S. Open you are going to try to win three of the four Grand Slams. Did you ever think that was possible?

A. Looking back, yes, but in the beginning you never think it's going to be an easy thing to do. After I won the Australian Open this year, people were talking about me winning the Grand Slam, and I thought that was impossible. If I can play better in the U.S. Open than in the past (Federer has lost in the fourth round the last three years), we'll have to see if it's good enough. I've never really been in a huge center-court match there. I need it for the experience.

Q. Do you still think it's impossible to win all four majors in one year?

A. Everything is possible. But the men's game is wide open. There are so many good players on all surfaces. To be up for every match is very difficult. I lost to a better man at the French (Gustavo Kuerten). I deserved to lose because Guga was better that day.

Q. What's the most extravagant thing you've bought? (Since turning pro at age 17 in 1998, Federer has won $11,491,230 on the ATP Tour.)

A. I make sure the people around me get treated well, first. I do get myself a nice gift on occasion, because I work hard. I got myself some cars, an apartment, a house. My favorite cars are Aston Martin.

Q. If you weren't playing tennis, what would you be doing?

A. I'd think I'd be a soccer player. I played until I was 12 and have followed it ever since. I never had dreams of being a pilot or anything — I've always been interested in sports.

Q. What's the biggest misconception about you?

A. In America, people don't know me well enough yet to have any misconceptions. They know the tennis player, but not the person. I am seldom in America, so when I'm here I'll try to do more interviews than in the past. I hope they see me as relaxed, cool. We'll have to see.

Q. What are your favorite places to visit?

A. Australia — I like the down-to-earth people, their friendliness. Rome is a great city. Miami for the culture and the beach. I love Asia more and more. After the U.S. Open, I'm going to visit L.A. for the first time.

Q. Are there any other players you like to watch?

A. I used to enjoy watching (fellow Swiss) Martina Hingis. With her gone, now my interest in women's tennis is not as high. On the men's side I used to like watching Marcelo Rios' game when he played.

Q. What do you expect to do with the rest of your life after tennis?

A. I created a charity last Christmas (The Roger Federer Foundation, helping disadvantaged youths) which is something that goes beyond my tennis game. After that, no real plans yet.

Q. What do you think of racket technology in tennis? Is it too developed?

A. I think it's OK. If you look at the top players, there is only one guy with incredible power, and that is Roddick. There is a misconception of the game being all power because of Andy. I play different, with feel and tactical decisions. If you look at the Spaniards, they play with spin. The players will always adapt.

Q. What are your goals for the U.S. Open?

A. I have high hopes. The dream is to win three of the four Grand Slams this year. But I really have to start from zero and play well from the first round on. I've lost some recently, and players might think I could be down. But I feel good.

Dominance index

How dominant has Roger Federer been in 2004?

In numbers

.875: In his last 25 tournaments going back to June 2003, he's 98-14 (.875) in matches, winning 12 titles.

1: Has been ranked No. 1 every week since Feb. 2 after winning his first Australian Open title.

2: He is the first player to win two Grand Slam titles in a season entering the U.S. Open since Pete Sampras in 1997.

3: He is trying to win three Grand Slam titles in a season for the first time since Mats Wilander won three in 1988.

5: One of five players (Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors, Stefan Edberg, Gustavo Kuerten) in the Open Era to win his first three Grand Slam finals. No player has won his first four finals.

8: He is the first player to win at least eight titles going into the U.S. Open since Thomas Muster won 10 in 1995.

14-0: He is undefeated (14-0) against top-10 opponents going back to the season-ending 2003 Tennis Masters Cup in Houston.

15-2: In the last two years he has a 15-2 mark in tournament finals, including 12 of 13.

23: Compiled a 23-match winning streak this year, the best since Sampras won 24 in a row in 1999.

1979: Won titles on grass (Halle, Wimbledon), clay (Gstaad) and hardcourt (Toronto), the first player to win consecutive titles on those surfaces since Borg in 1979.

In words

"He doesn't seem to have a weakness. ... He does have a chance to be one of the greatest players to ever live, no doubt."
- John McEnroe

"He does everything great. He knows the game well. As good as it gets out there, really."
- Andre Agassi

"Roger's the greatest, most complete player I have ever seen."
- Patrick Rafter

"He's a player that really could dominate the game a little bit, the same way Pete Sampras did for a while."
- Stefan Edberg

"Roger Federer is most probably a better player than Pete Sampras was. I think Federer can win all four (Grand Slams)."
- Mats Wilander



Right Frame